there was also on page 70 of the joint appendix an exhibit that the defense put in that make it look like one and a half hours to two hours total. i also -- chief justice roberts: you can finish your thought. ms. saharsky: there's one other piece of data, which is a nhtsa study that's referred to in the briefs, about where the court -- where folks in four states where warrants were required tried to get them quickly as possible. they put the judges on staff, they tried to do it electronically as much as possible, and still there it was one and half to two hours. that's on page 37 of that study. thank you. chief justice roberts: thank you, counsel. mr. shapiro. mr. shapiro: mr. chief justice, and may it please the court: the issue in this case is whether the state may stick a needle in the arm of everyone arrested on suspicion of drunk driving without a warrant and without consent. missouri's answer to that question is yes, even in routine dwi cases like this and regardless of how quickly and easily a warrant could be obtained. justice breyer: i thought the question was if -- if in fa